Friday, September 22, 2017

Reduce, Reuse, React
By A. J. Tripoli

            What is the point of recycling? Honestly. The extent of most people's knowledge on recycling ends at the fact that there is a different receptacle--well….usually. My 12 years in the Boy Scouts of America has taught me some interesting information on the topic that has brought me to care about where my trash goes and what happens to it. Recycling actually holds a crucial role in society, believe it or not, so knowing the ins-and-outs is important.
For example, recycling is a substantial way to save money. Producers of almost any type of plastic, metal or glass can benefit greatly from the manufacturing of products with reused materials. The Coca-Cola company, one of the largest companies in the world, focuses a great deal of its budget into ensuring that their products can be recycled properly. For most of the twentieth-century, most glass Coca-Cola bottles in circulation were cleaned and reused. In simple terms, more recycling equates to less money being poured into the creation of new bottles.
            Another benefit of reusing plastics and other recyclable containers is the effect their disposal has on the environment. When plastics are not recycled, they are usually burned due to the lack of landfill space. Both methods, however, are devastating for the environment. The incineration of plastics releases harsh airborne chemicals into the air and can impact anything from wildlife, to human health, to the wondrous Great Barrier Reef, which has been damaged beyond repair due to carbon dioxide emissions in Australia.
Pollution such as this has also led to key environmental changes in recent years. Hurricanes in North America have worsened in recent years due to change in Earth’s climate. Recently, 3 major hurricanes have appeared in the southern Atlantic ocean, the worst of which, Irma, is so strong that it wasn't able to be categorized in the standard 5 category rating system.
            This leads to the big question of how these problems can be avoided. The easiest way to help is to reach out to local municipalities about recycling. San Francisco, for example, has a great recycling program. In addition to one general recycling can per household, local parks and municipal areas can have up to 6 different types of recycling cans, such as paper, plastic, glass, etc. This saves the cost of sorting each material later in the recycling process. These bins make recycling easier, more intuitive, and help diminish the amount of pollution in the environment.

If more major cities implemented the use of sorted recycling, this would drastically reduce the amount of pollution to the Earth and money lost in most commercial production. Recycling is not only easy, but also extremely beneficial to both humans and our environment. Why should something so simple be so extremely overlooked? There is quite a bit you can do as a single person to help, and the effort is minimal.

An Artless World
By Allison Skiple

            Visit any school and walk down the fine arts hallway; there is music being played, children performing, and art being made. Choir, band, orchestra, theatre, dance, and art programs are now left to fend on their own financially. This leads aspiring artists to become discouraged about pursuing a career in the fine arts. Fine arts programs all across the US should be respected just as much as any other department.  It’s not asking too much.
            Statistically, students involved in a fine art do better in school in many aspects. Children learn how to work diligently both on their own and in a group. Their efforts at home and at school affect their whole entire group. Students learn how to connect, and affect others by the art that they make. As a student heavily involved in the fine arts, I know first hand on how the arts can change a person as they truly changed my life; they has built up my confidence and changed my perspective. I would be questioning my purpose because I wouldn't have anything to do or anything to live for. Why should dedicated artists have to suffer the cut?
            If colleges offer majors in the fine arts, then why don’t they offer more scholarships? Fine arts improve confidence and public speaking, which is crucial in any job. It might not be as easy to acquire a job, but people in the arts tend to be more hardworking over a person who is not. According to Princeton University in 2001 there were “2,511,000” people in a fine art profession out of “7.1 million employed workers” recorded by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics . There are ample jobs for a person wanting to pursue a career in the fine arts.
            Some argue that arts are a waste of time because they can’t get you anywhere in life. Yes, stereotypically, more athletes get scholarships than artists of any field. USA Today reports the average sports scholarship is about “$10,000” while a fine arts scholarship for music majors found on a website dedicated to music scholarships is about on average “$1,000 to $1,200”. Being the star athlete in comparison is more important than being the principal actor in a show. Both an athlete and a musician have to work incredibly hard to get to where they are; so why are people saying that one is better than the other? A professional athlete has work only in the prime of their body while artists, actors, dancers, and musicians have work for life.
            We, as a country, can learn to put the fine arts higher up on our lists. We need to support local fine art programs of all sorts and plug them into schools. Professionals try their best to inspire up and coming artists, but we need the support from the school to show children that they can succeed in doing what they love. Schools should put money where it is deserved and give equal credit to athletes and artists- “The “earth” without “art” is just eh.”





Works Cited

“Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.” Princeton University, The Trustees of Princeton

“Employment Situation: 2001.” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,

O'Shaughnessy, Lynn. “7 Things You Need to Know About Sports Scholarships.” USA Today,

“Scholarships for Music Majors.” Music Major - Majoring in Music,

majoringinmusic.com/scholarships-for-music-majors/.

The Impracticality of Imperial
By Christian Tchilikov

            Space travel has, without a doubt, resulted in a plethora of new cutting edge technologies. Whether you support it or not, space travel and the organizations behind it are known for pushing the boundaries of what is thought to be possible and performing herculean tasks with flawless execution. However, even NASA, the biggest and baddest of them all, managed to crash a $125 million, taxpayer funded, Mars probe. This wasn’t due to faulty components either, but rather the accident happened because of a simple misunderstanding between NASA and NASA’s partner company, Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin used “English units of measurement” whereas NASA used “the more the more conventional metric system”(Lloyd). Although the Mars Probe Incident of 1999 may be a dramatic example of the confusion that intertwining the two units causes, it serves to show that there is simply no need for the United States to use two units of measure.
            As a product of the US public schooling system, I feel that the imperial units of measurement are not only obsolete, but a burden on American students. For what reason are we as a nation teaching our children an outdated and inferior system of measurement, rather than the international standard of metric? As a solution, I believe it would be much more practical if the United States abandoned the imperial system and used the metric system not only for international and scientific purposes, but for domestic use as well. For those who don’t know, the imperial system consists primarily of inches, feet, and miles where there is no obvious interval to convert between the three. Metric, on the other hand, consists of centimeters, meters and kilometers, and each is ten times larger than the other, respectively. Not only is it harder to convert within Imperial, but converting between the two systems becomes a catastrophe. I myself have experienced the difficulties of this firsthand; whenever talking to anyone foreign, a measurement of some sort is always prone to arise. Because of the difference in the systems used, I am never able to aptly answer the question at hand. By teaching our students the imperial system, we are isolating them from the international language of measurement and setting them up for failure whenever the topic arises. Not only is this a minor inconvenience to students like me, but it becomes a larger problem in the bigger scheme of things. Whether it’s an airplane running out of fuel mid-flight, a patient receiving extreme doses of sedative, or NASA miscalculating several times, the end result is never cheap (Conradt).
            If that wasn’t enough to convince you, then perhaps it’s better to ask why shouldn’t the United States switch to metric? Often times the responses to this range from it’s “a piece of [our] heritage” to the fact that it’s un-American (Marciano). In regards to the metric system being a part of our heritage, just because something has been around for a long time does not make it good. The Imperial system is not a piece of aged cheese, rather it’s a moldy one that should have been disposed of a long time ago. As for the metric system being too “un-American,” it would be wise to note that the imperial system originated from England, so it, too, is not American. Aside from these trivial responses, there is no solid reason for us to refuse to switch.

            In conclusion, it is time for the United States to stop burdening its students, citizens and itself with an outdated system of measurement that burdens those who use it. The time to adopt the superior metric system is now, and I truly believe that in time the change will be a welcomed one and well worth the battle.